Author: admin (325 Articles)
Does it come as a surprise that a strip club allowed a stripper to do something dangerous? Isn’t it pretty common for strippers to be in chemically altered states? Should it be the job of club owners and managers to give their workers sobriety tests before letting them leave work?
I don’t know what the law is in Alabama, but in Arizona, I can’t imagine a jury buying this theory. Of course, it might have to decide who it likes less, the DUI stripper or the owner of the club who exploited her for profit.
How far should this extend. For example, if I let a member of my staff drive home after he or she had a bad day, and they drove away angry or upset and got hurt in an accident, should that employee be able to recover damages from me? Probably not. But what if I was the type of employer who engaged in systematic harrassment and taunting, and kicked the employee out? Still probably not.
My sense is that most people would have little sympathy for the stripper in this article. What if the same set of facts, but the stripper was instead a young professional associate encouraged to have a drinking power lunch with important clients who then gets into a wreck while impaired? The line I’m trying to discern here is does this theory fly under any situation.
I am interested in hearing your comments on the matter.
Quoted from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,358525,00.html:
BIRMINGHAM, Ala.
